Coverage Desk
₿ BitcoinΞ Ethereum◉ Stablecoins↗ Token Markets§ RegulationR On-Chain Data◇ Tokenization▦ Indexes

R Research

On-chain data, benchmarks, and evidence-led research

Use transparent methods to interpret blockchain data, digital asset indexes, tokenized claims, and market evidence without overstating conclusions.

Coverage framework

Research

Use transparent methods to interpret blockchain data, digital asset indexes, tokenized claims, and market evidence without overstating conclusions.

crypto researchon-chain datablockchain analyticsdigital asset indexes

Document the method

Reproducible research identifies contract addresses, labels, clustering rules, price sources, time windows, exclusions, and data versions. Readers should be able to understand which facts came from the ledger and which conclusions depend on interpretation.

Use several measures

Addresses are not users, transfers are not always payments, and dollar volume can rise because price changed. We compare activity, fees, liquidity, retention, concentration, and protocol context rather than allowing one metric to carry the whole claim.

Make uncertainty visible

Labels and entity clusters can be incomplete. We separate verified transactions, high-confidence attribution, heuristic inference, and speculation. When alternative explanations materially change the result, they belong in the analysis rather than in a footnote.

Recommended reading

Start with these guides

Each guide is a complete, source-linked explanation with visible publication and modification dates.

Featured graphic for Reading On-Chain Data Without Getting Misled
Researchon-chain datablockchain analytics

Reading On-Chain Data Without Getting Misled

Learn how address reuse, exchange wallets, bridges, smart contracts, entity clustering, timing, and denomination can distort blockchain metrics.

7 min read

Editorial scope

What this desk does not do

This desk does not publish price targets, personalized recommendations, paid token promotion, fabricated market data, or claims that a technical label eliminates risk. It explains systems and evidence so readers can ask better questions.